The CJ is delving into politics.

Does it mean that when an individual is aggrieved by the results of an election they should first approach the winner for a political solution before going to the courts? Is there a political process which is not governed by law and the Constitution?

How can the judiciary shield the parliament and the executive from following the law while executing their constitutional mandates? Doesn't each arm have a distinct mandate in which any interdependence can only be of administrative rather than of legal nature? 

With the way things are going, I wouldn't be surprised if the Adani scams are quickly laundered through our courts. The CJ is delving into politics which is going to completely erode the independence of the judiciary. 

The judiciary exists to serve justice to all whether they are individuals or arms of government. When the CJ pledges to shield some parties, how can Kenyans expect justice from the courts? This post is a sufficient ground for the CJ to be removed from office.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GENERAL EGG KNOWLEDGE

PRODUCER CEDO SPEAKS ON FALLOUT WITH NYASHINSKI

What are Fibroids